Cambridge City Council (25 007 329)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr X’s council tax account nor its failure to make its telephone line more accessible for disabled users. This is because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s management of his council tax account. He also complained that the Council’s telephone line was not accessible for disabled users.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council after he received a reminder notice for arrears on a new council tax account he had not been informed about. He also complained that contacting the Council was inaccessible for him and other users who shared his disability.
  2. The Council apologised and explained it did not receive information showing Mr X had become a sole occupant at the property until several months later and this was when it created the account. The Council confirmed it sent Mr X a letter informing him of this and could not explain why he did not receive it.
  3. The Council apologised for Mr X’s experience of trying to contact it and explained it would discuss the matter with its third-party supplier and update him on the outcome. The Council also gave Mr X a process to follow to make it easier for him to contact the Council in the future.
  4. Mr X remains unhappy with the Council’s actions and wants us to find it at fault. The evidence shows the Council has explained the actions it took on Mr X’s account and apologised for the experience he had. It has also taken on board Mr X’s unhappiness regarding its accessibility and has provided Mr X with a work around whilst it is investigating ways to improve the service. These actions are in line with what we would expect the Council to do. An investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings