London Borough of Ealing (25 004 272)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax enforcement because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council pursued Council tax arrears against her without proper notification.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that did not receive proper notification by the Council of the enforcement of a Council tax debt. As a result, the Council obtained a Liability Order against her with costs of £122.
  2. The Council has provided details to show that there were arrears at the time a second reminder letter was issued in September 2024. This was followed by a Final Notice in October 2024, summons in December 2024 and a Liability Order in February 2025.
  3. Ms X says that she did not receive these notifications and so the summons cost was unreasonable.
  4. Ms X could have asked for the Liability Order to be set aside on the grounds that she had not been properly notified. Nevertheless, the Council’s records show computer generated letters and so it would not be possible for the Ombudsman to prove that letters were not received by Ms X.
  5. In the absence of evidence of fault by the Council, the Ombudsman would not investigate this matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings