Cornwall Council (24 012 119)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council’s council tax premium for second homes discriminates against him. This is because: this policy can only be challenged by judicial review; Mr B may appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he considers his property should be given an exemption; and, Mr B may pursue his discrimination claim at court.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council has decided to increase council tax for second homes. Mr B says he has bought a property in the county which will become his main home when he returns to Cornwall to retire. Mr B says the Council’s policy indirectly discriminates against him as an indigenous Cornish person by financially disadvantaging him. Mr B says his property should be exempt from this policy to allow him to proceed with his retirement plans.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint.
  2. The Council has decided to charge an additional 100% council tax premium on second homes from April 2025.
  3. This decision to introduce this council tax premium is part of the Council’s council tax setting process, which can only be challenged by judicial review.
  4. So, we will not investigate a policy decision which the law says can only be challenged by judicial review.
  5. Also, if Mr B considers his property should be awarded an exemption from this policy, he may challenge the Council’s decision by putting in an appeal to the Valuation Tribunal once he receives a council tax bill. The Valuation Tribunal is in the best position to decide such matters and I find it is reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal.
  6. The Council has considered Mr B’s comments that the policy indirectly discriminates against him. The Council has explained in detail why it does not accept Mr B’s claim of indirect discrimination. Only the courts can decide whether a body has unlawfully discriminated against a person under the Equality Act 2010. Mr B may put in a claim against the Council at court if he wants to pursue this matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. For the above reasons, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings