West Suffolk Council (24 011 913)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax premium because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council imposed an empty home premium to a property she owned despite the difficulties she had preparing the property for let.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that, following the death of her mother, a property she co-owned with her needed significant repair and renovation.
  2. As this continued beyond the two year premium period, the Council imposed a Council tax premium from the date the property had been empty for two years.
  3. Mr X says that the Council is not legally allowed to do this and should have made a discretionary decision to waive the extra Council tax.
  4. Any dispute about the application of a premium or refusal to exercise discretion can be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings