London Borough of Ealing (24 005 323)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to consider requests about council tax payments and arrears. We cannot investigate complaints about matters which have been subject to court proceedings. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s handling of Mr X’s requests for a payment arrangement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to respond to emails which he sent asking for a reduced payment arrangement for his council tax. Says he did not receive any responses and the Council subsequently took court action and employed enforcement agents to recover the debt.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Me X says the Council failed to respond to his emailed requests for a payment arrangement from April 2024. The Council told him it has no record of receiving his emails and asked him to provide the email attachments and copies of the acknowledgement receipts which he says he received.
  2. Because Mr X fell behind with payments and did not contact the recovery team the recovery process resulted in a summons , a liability order and costs from enforcement agents.
  3. Mr X has not provided copies of evidence that the emails he sent were received either to the Council or to us. The recovery process is largely automated so if his emails were not correctly addressed the court procedure would apply. He received a summons with the correct email address to contact in June but did not attend the hearing or make an arrangement by July when the hearing was scheduled.
  4. We cannot investigate complaints about matters which have been subject to court proceedings. This commences with the issue of a summons in council tax cases.
  5. Since Mr X made a formal complaint the Council has taken the case back from the enforcement agents as a goodwill gesture and agreed a monthly payment arrangement with Mr X subject to his adhering to the scheme.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to consider requests about council tax payments and arrears. We cannot investigate complaints about matters which have been subject to court proceedings. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s handling of Mr X’s requests for a payment arrangement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings