London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (24 003 466)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an administrative error related to Mr X's council tax account. The Council has accepted fault, apologised and offered to defer the outstanding council tax owed over the next financial year. This is an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused. It is unlikely an investigation would add to this or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council made an administrative error in its handling of his council tax account. The Council has accepted its error, apologised to him, and offered to spread the outstanding council tax owed over the next financial year. Mr X says this is insufficient to remedy the injustice caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response to Mr X, the Council accepted it had made an administrative error which meant Mr X had been unable to view his council tax bill in his online account during early 2024. It apologised to Mr X for the error. It offered to defer the outstanding amount due and spread it over the 2024/25 financial year. It also told Mr X what action it had taken to prevent the fault recurring.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has apologised to Mr X for the error and offered to spread the payment of the outstanding amount due. This is a proportionate remedy for any injustice caused. It is unlikely further investigation could add to this or that we would reach a different outcome.
  3. Mr X also complains about poor complaints handling but we will also not investigate this. It is not a good use of our resources to investigate complaints about complaints handling when we are not investigating the substantive matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation by us would add to the Council’s response or reach a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings