London Borough of Hackney (24 000 488)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s pursuit of Miss X for unpaid council tax empty property premiums. This is because Miss X has right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal; it would be reasonable for her to use it.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council retrospectively applied an empty property premium to her council tax account without informing her.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council in late 2023 after receiving correspondence showing a large outstanding balance relating to council tax.
  2. The Council advised the balance was comprised of empty property premiums applied to the account retrospectively from 2019 when the property became unoccupied and unfurnished. The Council apologised for the inconvenience this caused and offered Miss X a payment plan.
  3. Miss X was unhappy with the Council’s actions as she believed she should not be held liable for the premiums before 2023 and brought her complaint to the Ombudsman.
  4. The Ombudsman will not usually exercise discretion to investigate a complaint where the complainant has right of appeal to a tribunal and it would be reasonable for them to use it. The Valuation Tribunal was set up to determine liability regarding cases like these. It is therefore open to Miss X to refer this matter to the Valuation Tribunal as it is best placed to decide whether she is liable for the outstanding amount the Council is pursuing her for.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal; it would be reasonable for her to use it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings