London Borough of Hackney (23 019 914)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 14 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Miss X’s council tax account. This is because the Council accepted fault and offered a suitable remedy. Further investigation would not be proportionate.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council:
    • Took enforcement action for council tax arrears in error; and
    • Did not respond to her Freedom of Information request.
  2. A Freedom of Information request is when a member of the public requests information held by a public authority.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council accepted fault for its handling of Miss X’s council tax account which led to it taking enforcement action in error. It apologised and offered Miss X £100 for the error and £150 for time, trouble and distress. This is a suitable remedy. Further investigation by the Ombudsman would not be proportionate or lead to a different outcome.
  2. Miss X’s complaint about the release of data would be better dealt with by the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because further investigation would not be proportionate or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings