Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (23 009 451)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council recovering unpaid Council tax from 2016-2022. We cannot investigate matters which have been subject to court proceedings and liability orders have been issued by a court in this case. It was reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal to challenge her council tax liability.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council using enforcement agents to recover unpaid council tax from a former address for the period 2015-2022. She disputes liability for the arrears and says it is unreasonable for the Council to pursue her as the sole debtor when it was a joint council tax account.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X says the Council has employed enforcement agents to pursue her for council tax arrears which it says she owes from 2016-2022. She disputes liability for the debt and says she was suffering from criminal behaviour in the area and had to leave the address in question for some time. She also says the account was in joint names, but the Council is pursuing her solely for the whole debt.
  2. The Council issued summonses at the time for the unpaid tax for each year and says Mrs X failed to respond or attend the court hearings at which liability orders were obtained. It also says she did not appeal against her liability to the Valuation Tribunal.
  3. The law says that councils can recover arrears from either or both parties on a council tax account as they are jointly and severally liable for payment.
  4. We cannot investigate matters which have been subject to court proceedings and the debt which the Council is recovering has liability orders issued for the respective council tax years in question. It was reasonable for Mrs X to challenge her liability by appealing to the Valuation Tribunal and the Council informed her of this right.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council recovering unpaid Council tax from 2016-2022. We cannot investigate matters which have been subject to court proceedings and liability orders have been issued by a court in this case. It was reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal to challenge her council tax liability.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings