Coventry City Council (23 006 749)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s liability to pay council tax. It was reasonable for him to use his right to appeal the matter to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has failed to apply a student exemption to his council tax, putting him at a financial detriment of over £3,000. He says he paid the amount the Council considered due to avoid the matter escalating to enforcement agents, but the Council has failed to refund the overcharged amount. He says he has also gone to inconvenience in trying to resolve the matter. He wants the Council to reapply his student exemption and refund the money he overpaid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s actions in relation to his Council tax bill for the 2019-2021 financial years. He says he was a student and should have been exempt from paying, but the Council has refused to accept he was exempt.
  2. The Valuation Tribunal considers appeals about council tax liability if, after the person has appealed to the Council, there remains a dispute. We will not usually consider such complaints. The Tribunal is an independent body with the power to decide whether Mr X should have been exempt from paying council tax for the period in question. There is not a good reason in this case for us to consider a complaint about the matter instead and it would have been reasonable for Mr X to use the appeals process available to him.
  3. Mr X says he has been discussing the matter with the Council for more than 12 months. It is open to Mr X to ask the Valuation Tribunal to consider a late appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to use his right to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings