Stoke-on-Trent City Council (22 012 742)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging the complainant an empty property council tax on a second property he owns. This is because the complainant can use his right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal if he considers the Council has wrongly applied its policy.

The complaint

  1. The complaint who I will call Mr X says the Council was wrong to apply an empty property council tax premium on a second home he owns.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council added an empty property council tax premium to Mr X’s council tax bill because it received information that the property was empty an unfurnished since 2019.
  2. Mr X feels the Council has not demonstrated that the property was unfurnished and not take into account the personal issues he and his family were facing at the time. He therefore considers that the premium has been wrongly.
  3. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is a complaint about liability and therefore he has a right to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal, the body which deals with council tax disputes.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings