Manchester City Council (22 006 887)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to take bankruptcy proceedings against Ms X for her unpaid council tax. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons for why Ms X could not have complained earlier.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s decision to take bankruptcy proceedings against her for unpaid council tax. She says the Council failed to apply appropriate discounts to her account which would have brought her below the threshold to start the proceedings. She says the Council’s actions caused her to lose her home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X acknowledges she failed to pay her council tax on time from 2011. Ms X has never applied for support with her Council tax or told the Council she was struggling to pay her council tax. The onus is on the individual to apply for any support they might be entitled to as councils cannot apply discounts, or provide support, if they are not aware of the individual’s circumstances.
  2. The Council wrote to Ms X to advise her it was starting bankruptcy proceedings in November 2017. The Council said Ms X did not respond to any of its correspondence, so it had no choice but to proceed.
  3. As Ms X knew she was not paying her Council tax liability when it fell due, it is reasonable to say she would have known, since 2011, she was accruing a debt. Further, the Council told Ms X of her debt and the bankruptcy action it was looking to take in 2017. If Ms X thought the Council was wrong to take bankruptcy action, or that the debt had been calculated incorrectly, it is reasonable for her to have complained in 2017, when she first became aware of the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons for why Ms X could not have complained earlier.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings