Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (21 018 195)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council says the complainant must pay full council tax even though he gets pension credit. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, complains the Council has not reduced his council tax even though he gets pension credit. Mr X says people who receive pension credit should pay less council tax but the Council will not reduce his bill.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes information about his claims for council tax reduction (CTR). I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. CTR is a benefit which helps people on a low income pay their council tax. People must submit an application for CTR with supporting evidence. The Council cannot assess a claim, and award CTR, unless someone makes an application.
  2. Mr X complains the Council has not reduced his council tax even though he is on a low income and gets pension credit. The Council says it sent CTR application forms to Mr X which he has either not returned or he did not send the supporting information. I have seen a letter the Council sent to Mr X in February which invited him to apply.
  3. Mr X submitted a CTR claim in March. The Council closed the application in May because he had not provided the supporting evidence. Mr X sent the outstanding evidence on 23 May and the Council awarded CTR on 24 May. The Council has also awarded a £50 hardship payment.
  4. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. Mr X is on a low income but the Council could not reduce his council tax until Mr X submitted a claim for CTR with the supporting information. When Mr X submitted a claim and supporting evidence the Council awarded CTR. There is no suggestion of fault by the Council and no reason to start an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings