City of York Council (21 010 784)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council refused to grant a council tax reduction on a property he owns which was empty due to the Covid-19 restrictions. We cannot lawfully question council tax policy or achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council charged full council tax during a period when he could not sell or rent out the property due to Covid-19 restrictions. Mr X says the Council’s policy should allow a 30% reduction or it should allow him a two month grace period. Mr X says the Council has served two court summonses because he has not paid the tax. Mr X says he will pay if he gets the reduction and given the stress and inconvenience the Council should waive the tax.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Mr X’s information and comments. The Council has supplied its complaint reply to Mr X explaining its position. I have considered the Council’s website information on ‘property discounts and exemptions’.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate this complaint for the following reasons:
  2. The Ombudsman cannot lawfully question council tax policy. The Local Government Finance Act 1992 section 66, as amended by the 2012 Act, says a council tax reduction scheme can only be challenged at court via judicial review. The Council has removed general discounts for empty or unoccupied properties. It was entitled not to change the policy during the Covid-19 pandemic.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot achieve what Mr X wants. The Council has explained that during Covid-19 it sought to assist with hardship cases. There is no indication Mr X is in that category given the property was not his home and previously rented out.
  4. The Council has not caused Mr X an injustice by its enforcement action. It has a duty to collect council tax. Although Mr X says the Council had to reissue a summons it has acted because Mr X has chosen to withhold payment of his tax.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council refused to grant a council tax reduction on a property he owns which was empty due to the Covid-19 restrictions. We cannot lawfully question council tax policy or achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings