City of York Council (21 003 163)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains that the Council unreasonably applied the empty homes premium to his property. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because any dispute about the determination of the policy can only be challenged in the courts by judicial review. Further, any dispute about his liability for the premium to his property could be appealed to a Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council unreasonably applied the empty homes premium to his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that the Council applied the empty homes premium (an increase of 100%) to his council tax as his property had been empty for over two years. He says that this is not fair as he has had problems completing the work required to the house to make it habitable.
  2. The Valuation Tribunal has confirmed that any dispute about the determination of the empty premium levy to a property can only be considered by the courts via judicial review. The Valuation Tribunal can consider an appeal against any dispute as to liability for the levy or use of discretionary powers by the Council.
  3. The tribunal is an independent, expert body whose decisions are binding on the Council. I therefore consider that it would be reasonable to pursue an appeal in this case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because this is a matter for the courts or an appeal can be made to a Valuation Tribunal.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings