London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (20 009 887)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr E’s complaint about interest on his council tax refund. The Valuation Office, not the Council, is the body responsible for the decision which affected Mr E, and it is not a body we can investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr E says the incorrect Council Tax banding was applied to his property in the early 1990’s and he should be awarded interest on the refund he has received.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as the Valuation Office. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint where the body complained about is not responsible for the issue being raised. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr E said in his complaint and material provided by Mr E in communications between himself, the Council, and the Valuation Office.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr E complained to the Council and the Valuation Office that the incorrect banding had been applied to his property in the early 1990’s, which meant he had been paying a higher rate of Council Tax.
  2. The Valuation Office decides on Council Tax banding and the relevant council collect fees based upon that banding.
  3. The Valuation Office wrote to Mr E on 18th October 2020 confirming it had changed the band of the property from G to F and backdated this to 1993.
  4. Mr E then contacted the Council which confirmed he was due a refund of almost £7,000, which it paid him in early November 2020.
  5. Mr E then contacted the Council requesting interest on the refund and was told that it does not provide interest and the Valuation Office used to, but no longer does.
  6. The root cause of the complaint is the decisions by the Valuation Office about his council tax banding, not the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint because it is about the action of a body the Ombudsman cannot investigate, and the Council is not responsible for the matter.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings