East Suffolk Council (19 020 487)
Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 12 Mar 2020
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about how much Council Tax Reduction the complainant should receive from the Council. There is a right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal against any decision on Council Tax Reduction entitlement.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr C, has complained about how much Council Tax Reduction (CTR) the Council has awarded him.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. It says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
- Where someone has already appealed to a tribunal, we cannot investigate and have no discretion in this. The courts have decided this restriction applies even if the appeal could provide a remedy for all the claimed injustice.
How I considered this complaint
- I have considered what Mr C said in his complaint and background information provided by the Council. Mr C commented on a draft before I made this decision.
What I found
- The Council awards CTR in accordance with a published scheme. CTR reduces how much council tax someone must pay based on their circumstances.
- The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on CTR.
- The Council’s letters saying how much CTR someone has been awarded explain there is a right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.
- Mr C has previously appealed to the Valuation Tribunal against how much CTR the Council has awarded him.
Final decision
- I have decided we will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is reasonable for Mr C to appeal against any decision on his entitlement to CTR, if he has not already done so.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman