Liverpool City Council (19 017 136)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his council tax bill. This is because the complaint is late, and if Mr X disputed the amount owed, it was reasonable for him to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X disputes the council tax bill he has received from when he stayed in a serviced apartment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can, or could have appealed to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be, or was unreasonable, to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  4. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered Mr X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information he provided. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on his complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X disputes his council tax bill from when he stayed in a serviced apartment. Mr X has been complaining to the Council since May 2018.
  2. The Ombudsman normally expects people to complain to us within twelve months of them becoming aware of a problem. We look at each complaint individually, and on its merits, considering the circumstances of each case. But we do not exercise discretion to accept a late complaint unless there are good reasons to do so. I do not consider that to be the case here. I see no reason why Mr X could not have complained much earlier, and so the exception at paragraph 3 applies to his complaint. In reaching this decision I have taken into account the point I make below.
  3. The Ombudsman is not a right of appeal for people who disagree with their council tax bill. When there is a right of appeal to a tribunal, the Ombudsman normally expects them to use that right, unless it is unreasonable for them to do so. The Valuation Tribunal is an independent, expert body, set up by Parliament for people who want to challenge decisions about council tax or council tax support. I see no reason Mr X could not have used his appeal rights. The Tribunal could have decided Mr X’s liability for council tax and how much he should pay.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because the complaint is late, and it was reasonable for Mr X to have appealed to the Valuation Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings