Mendip District Council (22 004 995)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with council tax support and payments on outstanding council tax. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Miss X, complains that the Council reduced her council tax support meaning she went into arears and that she has made council tax payments which have subsequently been removed from her council tax bill, resulting in her receiving letters for money she does not owe.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Valuation Tribunal deals with appeals against decisions on council tax liability and council tax support or reduction.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate how the Council dealt with Miss X’s council tax support. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. Changes to the level of support Miss X received were made after the Council received information about her income. Miss X subsequently submitted a new application, which resulted in her council tax support being increased and backdated. If Miss X disagrees with the level of council tax support offered by the Council, it would be reasonable to expect her to appeal to the Valuation Tribunal.
  2. I will also not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council has dealt with her council tax payments. This is because there is insufficient fault by the Council. Miss X has two bills with outstanding council tax balances. The payments she made were on her oldest bill, but the Council made the decision to reallocate them to her most recent bill. This is something the Council is entitled to do. The Council has told the Ombudsman that if Miss X wishes it has the discretion to move payments to whichever bill she wants and is also happy to set up a payment arrangement with Miss X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings