London Borough of Redbridge (21 004 282)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax support

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council stopped her council tax reduction and failed to communicate with her properly before resolving the matter. There is insufficient evidence of fault or injustice.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council stopped her council tax reduction because of information from the Department for Work and Pensions and failed to communicate with her properly. Miss X says although she is now getting full council tax support she is concerned other people could have similar experiences.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and Council. I have discussed the complaint with Ms X by telephone.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate this complaint for the following reasons:
  2. There is insufficient evidence of Council fault or service failure. The Council suspended rather than ended the claim. This was due to information from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The Council wrote to Miss X twice, at the correct address, because it was necessary to reassess her entitlement. Miss X tells me she did not receive the written communications but picked up a telephone message from the Council and contacted it.
  3. The Council has not caused Ms X an injustice. The Council says the DWP later informed it Ms X was on a different benefit which enabled it to assess her on the basis of 100% entitlement. Ms X tells me she is on full council tax support, it took 2 or 3 weeks to resolve, and she has a small credit on her account. She says the officer who dealt with her said she was very sorry for what had happened.
  4. The complaint appears resolved. Should there be a dispute about entitlement to council tax support or a council tax discount Ms X would have a right of appeal to the Valuation Tribunal which would put the matter outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint the Council stopped her council tax reduction and failed to communicate with her properly before resolving the matter. There is insufficient evidence of fault or injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings