Devon County Council (25 018 459)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a renewal of her blue badge. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a blue badge renewal. Mrs X says her condition has not changed and she does not understand why her application has been refused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. People may qualify for a badge if they are unable to walk, experience very considerable difficulty when walking, which may include very considerable psychological distress, or are at serious risk of harm when walking.
  2. Mrs X applied for a blue badge. She explained her medical and mobility issues and provided supporting evidence. The Council considered Mrs X’s application and supporting evidence. It decided the application did not meet the qualifying criteria and so refused her application. Mrs X appealed against the decision but the Council maintained its refusal.
  3. The Council considered the information Mrs X provided. The appeal notes show the assessor considered Mrs X’s medical conditions and the government guidance. It said that she did not provide enough evidence of her mobility. The assessment report noted more documented medical evidence was needed to show the impact of her condition on her mobility. The Council explained that while Mrs X had some difficulties, they did not reach the threshold for a blue badge
  4. We do not act as an appeal body and can only consider if there was fault in the way the Council made the decision. Although Mrs X disagrees with the outcome, there is insufficient evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision so there is no reason to start an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings