London Borough of Harrow (25 014 232)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X’s Blue Badge application. This is because there is enough evidence of fault, in the Council’s decision, to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained that the Council rejected her Blue Badge application and then her appeal. She said it did not take account of her medical conditions. Mrs X said this worsened her physical health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X said the Council failed to consider her medical conditions during her application for a Blue Badge.
  2. The Council’s initial consideration of Mrs X’s request and appeal correspondence demonstrates it considered Mrs X’s medical conditions, but this still fell short of the level of impairment that would mean Mrs X was eligible for a Blue Badge.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether the complainant disagrees with the decision the Council made.
  4. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault. On the information available in the reports I have seen, there is evidence the Council have followed the processes and considered Mrs X’s medical needs, scored them in line with its assessment criteria and decided she did not meet the threshold for a Blue Badge. It also considered the additional information Mrs X provided as part of her appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings