Leeds City Council (25 013 794)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 03 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council refused her application for a blue badge. This is because, at our invitation, the Council agreed to arrange a new walking assessment. We consider this a suitable remedy.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s decision to refuse her application for a Blue Badge. She says during the assessment the assessor said she was not comfortable administering an EpiPen if required. As a result, Miss X declined to proceed with the walking element of the assessment for fear of it triggering a medical condition. The Council later refused her application and appeal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing Miss X injustice. The walking assessment was not completed, so the Council considered the application without obtaining the mobility evidence it had intended to gather. This meant the decision was made without all the relevant information and the evidence we have does not satisfy us that the Council has properly reached a decision.
  2. The Council’s decision and appeal responses are unclear about whether it has properly considered the effects of Miss X’s non-visible disability on her when trying to complete a journey which involves walking some distance.

Back to top

Agreed actions

  1. The Council, to its credit, has agreed to do the following to put things right:
      1. Arrange a further walking assessment and ask Miss X if she would like someone who can administer her medication to accompany her.
      2. Reconsider Miss X’s application taking account of the walking assessment and all documents and medical evidence previously submitted and reach a fresh decision.
      3. Write to Miss X with the result and any next steps open to her.
  1. The Council will complete these within one month of the date of this decision statement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by agreeing to arrange a new walking assessment and reaching a fresh decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings