East Sussex County Council (25 013 572)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council refused an application for a blue badge. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council refusing his blue badge application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))T
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. People may qualify for a badge if they are unable to walk, experience very considerable difficulty when walking, which may include very considerable psychological distress, or are at serious risk of harm when walking.
  2. Mr X applied for a blue badge. He explained his medical and mobility issues and provided supporting evidence, including from his consultant and GP. The Council considered Mr X’s application and supporting evidence. It decided the application did not meet the qualifying threshold and so refused his application. Mr X appealed the decision, but the Council upheld its refusal.
  3. The Council considered the information Mr X provided. The appeal notes show the assessor considered Mr X’s medical conditions and the government guidance. It decided to give more weight to the consultant’s evidence than to some other points. The Council gave reasons for deciding that, while Mr X has some difficulties, they did not reach the threshold for a blue badge.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault. We do not act as an appeal body and can only consider if there was fault in the way the Council made the decision. Although Mr X disagrees with the decision, there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision so there is no reason to start an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings