Westminster City Council (25 008 649)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 25 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about problems the complainant had renewing a disabled person's freedom pass. This is because the Council has provided a satisfactory remedy.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about problems he encountered when he tried to renew his disabled person’s freedom pass. He wants the Council to admit it should not have cancelled his pass and to check if other people have had the same problem.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In December the Council sent Mr X a renewal form for his disabled person’s freedom pass which was due to expire in March. Mr X needed some information from the Council but it did not respond to his emails or calls. Due to the lack of response Mr X could not submit the form until mid-February. Unfortunately, a few days earlier, the Council cancelled his pass because he had not returned his renewal form before 3 February. Mr X says he could not send the form before the deadline because the Council had not responded or answered his questions.
  2. In response to his complaint the Council apologised for the lack of response and delays. It explained the steps it has taken to stop the problem being repeated, refunded the additional travel costs Mr X incurred while he was without a pass, and awarded £50 in recognition of his distress and inconvenience. The Council explained it had deactivated the pass because it had not received the renewal form.
  3. I will not start an investigation because the Council has provided a fair and proportionate response which remedies the injustice caused to Mr X. The Council has admitted poor service, apologised, paid a refund and compensation, and taken steps to improve its service. Mr X wants the Council to answer additional questions, and clarify points about the renewal process, but the Council has provided a fair remedy and there are no outstanding issues that require an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the Council has provided a satisfactory remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings