East Sussex County Council (25 000 117)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s blue badge application. This is because we could not reasonably achieve more through investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision that he does not qualify for a blue badge. Mr X claims the Council did not assess him properly and requests a face-to-face assessment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied for a blue badge. The Council assessed the paperwork and completed a desk-based assessment and decided Mr X did not qualify. Mr X appealed this decision, prompting a review. However, the Council upheld its original decision and rejected the application, again without a face-to-face assessment.
  2. While we were considering the complaint
  3. I think my suggestion is more accurate and neutral.

    , the Council completed an in-person mobility assessment. This is what Mr X was requesting, and we could not reasonably achieve more than this by investigating whether the Council might have been at fault for not offering a face-to-face assessment sooner

    Suggest adding this just to emphasise we haven’t taken a view on whether Cl was at fault.

    .

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we could not reasonably achieve more than the Council has now done.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings