London Borough of Lewisham (24 019 496)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful application for a Blue Badge. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, disagrees with the Council’s decision not to issue another Blue Badge.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council. This includes the medical evidence, Council assessments and the decision letters. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. People may qualify for a badge if they are unable to walk, experience considerable difficulty when walking or are at serious risk of harm when walking. People with a non-physical disability (sometimes called a hidden disability) might qualify if they experience severe psychological distress while walking or are at serious risk of harm while walking or pose a risk to others. Not everyone with a hidden disability will qualify for a badge.
  2. People qualify if they get specific points/descriptors with a benefit called Personal Independence Payment (PIP). To qualify they must receive eight moving around points or descriptor (E) for not being able to undertake a journey due to overwhelming psychological distress.
  3. The Council issued a badge in 2021 but says it was issued in error. Ms X applied for another badge in 2024 under the hidden disability rules. She explained her medical conditions and the problems she experiences. Ms X also referred to some physical walking problems. She submitted some medical evidence and said she receives PIP; her PIP award is for difficulties planning a journey and not for overwhelming psychological distress.
  4. The Council assessed the application. It did a desk based assessment, and two face-to-face assessments, in relation to the hidden disability rules and the walking criteria. It recognised Ms X has medical conditions, but it decided there was no evidence to demonstrate she meets the criteria under the hidden disability rules or the walking rules. As part of this process an assessor watched Ms X walk and noted she had not provided any medical evidence to confirm she experiences severe psychological distress while walking or is at serious risk of harm while walking.
  5. I will not investigate this complaint because it is unlikely I would find fault. We do not act as an appeal body and I can only consider if there was fault in the way the Council made the decision. I have no power to award a badge and it is not my role to re-assess the application or decide if Ms X is eligible for a badge.
  6. Ms X disagrees with the Council’s decision and has explained how having a badge would help. However, we can only intervene if there is fault in the way the Council made the decision and I have not seen any evidence of fault. The Council considered all the information and decided to reject the application because there was no evidence showing Ms X experiences significant psychological distress while walking or has considerable physical difficulties in walking. In addition, although Ms X receives PIP, the Council was correct to say the award is not one that passports her to a badge. The Council says it issued a badge in 2021 in error but that has no bearing on the current application because each claim is assessed afresh and there is no guarantee a badge will be renewed.
  7. I have considered the evidence Ms X submitted, and the Blue Badge rules, and I have not identified any fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings