Surrey County Council (24 018 301)

Category : Adult care services > Transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s rejection of a blue badge application. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council made its decision to justify an Ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms B says the Council has rejected her blue badge application, despite her having one for years and her health and mobility not having changed. Ms B says not having a blue badge has a negative impact on her health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The blue badge scheme is to help people with severe mobility problems caused by visible and non-visible (hidden) disabilities to access goods and services by allowing them to park close by. The Department for Transport sets out how councils should consider applications for a blue badge.
  2. The Council has followed the correct process to assess Ms B for a blue badge by an expert assessor and has reviewed the decision to decline Ms B’s application following appeal. Ms B then made a further application, which again the Council followed the correct process to consider and explain why it was declining the blue badge.
  3. Although Ms B previously had a blue badge, that does not make you automatically eligible following its expiry. While I appreciate Ms B’s disappointment, there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council for the Ombudsman to question or criticise its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings