What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Suffolk County Council (25 020 425)

Category : Adult care services > Transition from childrens services

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to progress a Care Act assessment. This is because any injustice is not significant enough.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to complete a Care Act transition or adult needs assessment for her son, Mr Y. And handled her complaints poorly.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Mrs X’s complaints the Council accepted it failed to correctly progress a referral for a Care Act assessment for Mr Y in August 2025. It apologised, confirmed it would train its staff to prevent recurrence, and agreed to allocate a social worker, complete an assessment and consider Mr Y’s housing needs. I note the assessment has since been completed and resulted in the Council agreeing to provide support to promote independent living once Mr Y had moved into his own accommodation.
  2. The Council has already taken appropriate action to resolve the complaint. While its delay will have caused distress and uncertainty, the remaining injustice is not significant enough to justify an investigation.
  3. It is not a proportionate use of resources to investigate the Council’s complaint handling when we are not investigating the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because any injustice is not significant enough.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings