London Borough of Sutton (25 022 938)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about adult safeguarding. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council ended its safeguarding involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained that the Council did not complete a safeguarding investigation.
  2. Miss X said that it has impacted her health.
  3. Miss X wants the Council to complete a safeguarding assessment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has a duty to make safeguarding enquiries if it considers an adult is at risk of abuse or neglect.
  2. Miss X made a safeguarding self-referral to the Council. She said the actions of her housing provider compromised her welfare and safety. A Social Worker from the Council contacted Miss X as part of its enquiry in response to the safeguarding referral.
  3. As part of its enquiry, the Council contacted Miss X’s housing provider and asked it to undertake repairs. The housing provider confirmed that it would do so. The Council also signposted Miss X to information on housing needs and community alarm systems. The Council concluded Miss X could competently advocate for herself and closed her enquiry.
  4. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  5. We will not investigate this complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating in how the Council reached its decision to close Miss X’s safeguarding enquiry.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about adult safeguarding. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council ended its safeguarding involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings