Safeguarding


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Middlesbrough Borough Council (24 010 390)

    Statement Not upheld Safeguarding 20-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained that the Council failed in its safeguarding duties towards him. We did not find fault with the Council’s actions.

  • West Sussex County Council (24 017 091)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 20-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to safeguarding and other actions relating to Mrs X’s mental capacity assessment. This is because we do not have consent from Mrs X to investigate, and nor do we believe Mrs Y can make a complaint about these actions, on Mrs X’s behalf, as her representative.

  • Surrey County Council (24 019 870)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 20-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to Mrs X’s mental capacity. This is because we do not have consent from Mrs X to investigate, and nor do we believe Mrs Y can make a complaint about these actions, on Mrs X’s behalf as her representative.

  • Hertfordshire County Council (24 008 995)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate the Council’s response to Mr X’s concerns about a third party’s involvement in his parent’s finances. This is because we are unlikely to be able to add anything to the Council’s investigation.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (24 016 641)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 13-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained the NHS Trust and the Council moved his father from hospital into a care home that could not meet his needs. Mr X says the failings led to his father suffering an injury which hastened his death. Mr X also complained the Council missed carer’s assessments, which meant he missed payments. We will not investigate these complaints because there is not enough evidence of fault with the discharge planning or with how the Council dealt with a carer’s assessment request. Other complaints about earlier carer’s assessments were late.

  • London Borough of Bexley (24 019 166)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s investigation into a safeguarding incident. This is because the injustice is not sufficient to warrant an investigation.

  • Essex County Council (24 015 301)

    Statement Upheld Safeguarding 12-May-2025

    Summary: Ms X complains the Council failed to recognise that a malicious safeguarding concern had been raised about her, resulting in it investigating the concern and subjecting her to supervised contact with her son. The Council accepts it should have started making safeguarding enquiries when it first received the concern in December 2023 and has apologised. There is no other evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Leeds City Council (24 020 302)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council failing to fully investigate safeguarding concerns about a relative. This is because the injustice is not sufficient to warrant an investigation, and we would not achieve significantly more than the Council has already suggested.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (24 014 257)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 07-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a safeguarding referral. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

  • Cornwall Council (24 016 160)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 05-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the care and support provided to her daughter, Miss Y, by Cornwall Council and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. This is because the courts are currently considering these matters. Ms X can return to us at the conclusion of the legal process if she remains dissatisfied and we will consider whether there is any further action for us to take.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings