London Borough of Haringey (25 022 315)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to investigate a complaint. This is because the injustice caused by poor complaints handling is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has refused to investigate his complaint about failing to act when he made a safeguarding referral.
  2. He says this has caused him stress, anxiety and uncertainty as he cannot be sure the Council is taking his concerns seriously. He says he has spent time providing the Council with further information and he has lost trust in the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I appreciate Mr X is frustrated by the lack of response from the Council about his concerns. However, we would not normally investigate a complaint about poor complaints handling when we are not investigating the original complaint matter. As the injustice caused by the poor complaints handling is not usually sufficient on its own to justify further investigation.
  2. I am satisfied the Council has acted on Mr X’s safeguarding referral. This means we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions in responding to a safeguarding referral. Therefore, it would not be reasonable to carry out a further investigation into the original complaint. I do not consider the injustice linked to the poor complaints handling to be sufficient to warrant an investigation into poor complaints handling on its own.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation and any injustice caused by poor complaints handling is not significant enough to warrant further investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings