London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (25 014 230)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s action relating to, and its decision to close, a safeguarding enquiry. We are unlikely to find fault with the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complains the Council prematurely closed its safeguarding enquiry concerning her relative, (Ms X). Mrs Y says greater Council intervention may have prevented Ms X’s subsequent passing. Mrs Y wants the Council to conduct a safeguarding adults review.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Y.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Following a referral that another person made to the Council about Mrs X, it conducted enquiries under section 42 of the Care Act to investigate a safeguarding concern. On balance of the evidence I have seen, it visited Mrs X and sought her views. Because it was concerned about Mrs X’s living conditions, it offered her support, including respite care and said it could arrange for a clean-up of her property. Ms X declined support.
  2. The Council also assessed Ms X’s mental capacity. As Ms X was assessed as having mental capacity, to be able to make her own decisions, the Council did not have the authority to override Ms X’s refusal of further support. The Council took what steps it could to improve Ms X’s living conditions, including contacting Ms X’s immediate family relatives. It then closed its safeguarding enquiry.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council’s decision to close the case under these circumstances.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings