Nottinghamshire County Council (25 007 883)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions in relation to a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisation concerning his brother, Mr Y and his placement at a care home. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to raise his concerns with the Court of Protection.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s actions in relation to a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisation concerning his brother, Mr Y and his placement at a care home. He said:
    • the Council did not properly complete an application for a renewal of an existing DoLS authorisation in place; and
    • Mr Y’s social worker is not an appropriate person to support him in relation to the matter.
  2. Mr X said it has caused him and the family distress. His brother is also isolated as he has not been able to visit the family. He wants the Council to complete a reassessment of the DoLS. Mr X also wants his brother to be able to leave the Care Home as he wishes to visit the family regularly.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. Mr X wants to challenge the DoLS authorisation which is in place so his brother can leave the Care Home as he wishes to visit the family. It would be reasonable for Mr X to make an application to the Court of Protection, if he has the authority to do so, to review the current DoLS in place.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as it would be reasonable for him to raise his concerns with the Court of Protection.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings