Residential care

Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Essex County Council (19 008 038)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 26-May-2020

    Summary: Ms X complains about the care her late mother received at a care home, leaving her mother with injuries. She also complains about how the Council carried out a safeguarding enquiry following this incident. The Ombudsman finds fault with the care Mrs Y received at the Care Home and the way the Council carried out its safeguarding enquiry. The Ombudsman has made recommendations to remedy the injustice caused which the Council has agreed to.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (18 012 265)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 22-May-2020

    Summary: Ms F complains the Council failed to provide adequate care to her late mother, Mrs J. She says this negatively affected her mother's health and quality of life and prevented Ms F from spending quality time with Mrs J. Care Home X did not provide adequate care in December 2018 and January 2019. The Council has agreed to apologise to Ms F.

  • London Borough of Bromley (18 016 428)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 07-Apr-2020

    Summary: Mr X's Solicitor says the Council is at fault for charging a third-party top-up fee for his care. The Council should not have charged a top-up before it had a top-up agreement with his daughter. The Council therefore needs to refund the top-up she paid up to 4 March 2015.

  • Bupa Care Homes (CFC Homes) Limited (19 013 346)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 01-Apr-2020

    Summary: Ms X complained about the level of care provided to her mother, Mrs M, whilst she was in a care home. The care provider was at fault for failing to put Mrs M's name on the list to be seen by a nurse practitioner when Ms X requested this. It has already apologised for this.

  • Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited (19 007 619)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Care Provider gave her grandmother, Mrs G, insufficient notice to leave Hanley House Residential Care Home and then refused to let her collect her personal possessions. Mrs X said this caused distress and inconvenience to Mrs G and other family members. The Care Provider was at fault when it failed to provide written confirmation it had given Mrs G notice and failed to give her sufficient notice. It has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Mrs D to acknowledge the distress and anxiety this caused.

  • London Borough of Croydon (19 007 129)

    Statement Not upheld Residential care 27-Mar-2020

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault by the Council in this complaint. It followed the code of practice set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 before coming to a decision not to move Mr & Mrs Y from their care home.

  • London Borough of Newham (19 006 386)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 24-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs B complains about the care provided by Romford Care Centre (RCC) to her father, Mr D. There was fault by the Council and the care provider. The Council will apologise and make a payment to Mrs B.

  • Southend-on-Sea Borough Council (18 012 591)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 24-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs X and Mrs Z complain about the care provided to Mrs Y and that the Care Provider gave notice in response to their complaints. This meant Mrs Y had to move from her home and caused Mrs X and Mrs Y significant stress and anxiety. They also complain that the Council failed to deal adequately with the issues. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault in all these issues. It has agreed to apologise, reimburse some fees and pay £200 to Mrs X and Mrs Z. It will also take action to avoid similar problems in future.

  • Hestoncourt Limited (19 001 354)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 24-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the care provided to Mrs Y and the way the Care Provider dealt with her complaint about that. The Ombudsman finds the Care Provider caused injustice in the way it dealt with Mrs X's complaints as it falsified records and was not open about the events. He also finds the Care Provider did not adequately care for Mrs Y. He recommends the Care Provider apologise and provide training to all staff about the importance of accurate records.

  • Sentimental Care Limited (19 014 142)

    Statement Not upheld Residential care 24-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mrs X and Mrs Z complain that the Care Provider gave 12 days' notice and would not refund fees paid in advance. It also would not deal with their complaint about this. The Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation as the Care Provider has ceased trading and we cannot achieve the outcome Mrs X and Mrs Z want.