Sandstone Care Cheshire Limited (24 020 982)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about privately arranged adult social care in a care home. It is unlikely we would add to investigations already undertaken or reach a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Ms E says the care provided to her relative, Ms F, at Priesty Fields care home was inadequate. Ms E says:
    • the staffing levels were too low,
    • Ms F had no care plan,
    • Ms F was not moved from her bed or given physiotherapy,
    • The care home did not support Ms F to eat,
    • Ms F did not receive medication as required.
  2. Ms E says Ms F’s dignity was compromised and she was in pain at the end of her life. Ms E says this was distressing for Ms F’s family to witness.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • the action has not caused significant enough injustice to the person who complained to justify our involvement, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the care provider or other body, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms F lived at Priesty Fields, run by Sandstone Care Cheshire Limited (the Care Provider).
  2. Ms F has since died, so we can provide her with no remedy for any poor care she may have received. While it was distressing for Ms F’s family to see her health declining, this is not significant enough injustice to justify an Ombudsman investigation where we can achieve nothing for the person receiving the care.
  3. The Care Provider has completed an investigation looking at the relevant evidence of care records, medication administration records, and staffing levels. The Care Provider was satisfied it provided an acceptable service to Ms F.
  4. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates care providers in England. The CQC can consider issues such as staffing levels, medication administration, care planning, and record keeping, to improve service in the wider public interest. The CQC is already involved with this provider and has an action plan to improve the standards of quality and safety.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms E’s complaint because it is unlikely we would add to investigations already undertaken or reach a different outcome. We can provide no remedy to Ms F and the CQC is already working with the Care Provider to improve service.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings