King Charles Court Limited (25 019 059)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Nursing Home preventing Mr Y from moving to another placement. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Nursing Home prevented Mr Y from moving to another placement. He said the Nursing Home was not suitable for Mr Y which caused him to deteriorate. It caused Mr X distress. Mr X wants the Nursing Home to acknowledge it acted with fault.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Care Provider.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y had dementia and had problems with his mental capacity. He started his placement at the Nursing Home on an initial four-week trial. Mr X said Mr Y was unhappy at the Nursing Home and it had severely affected his health. Mr X said Mr Y wanted to move to another placement and so he arranged for another care provider to visit him in the Nursing Home to complete an assessment. However, Mr X said the Nursing Home did not allow the assessment to happen.
  2. In response to Mr X’s complaint, the Nursing Home said as Mr X did not have Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for Mr Y’s health and welfare and he was also not named as a next of kin, Mr X was not able to make any decisions on behalf of Mr Y. It said it had spoken with Mr Y’s Social Worker and made them aware it was not able to support Mr Y to move to another placement until an independent advocate was present to support him during any assessments.
  3. After three months, Mr Y moved to another placement following an assessment where an independent advocate supported him.
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Nursing Home. As Mr Y lacked capacity, he required support to determine whether it was in his best interest to move to another placement. Mr X did not have LPA of Mr Y’s health and welfare and so he did not have the authority to make such decisions on behalf of Mr Y. The Nursing Home’s actions were therefore appropriate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Nursing Home.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings