Earlsdon Care Ltd (25 009 330)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this late complaint about the care provided to Mr Y up to 2023. There is not a good reason for the delay in the matter being escalated to the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Care Provider’s actions towards her father when he lived in the care home, until 2023. She said the Care Provider abused Mr Y and used medication to keep him docile. She said the matter ultimately led to Mr Y being evicted, and significant distress for the family. She wanted the Care Provider to be held to account.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s complaint is about events in the care home up to late 2023. Her sister complained to the Care Provider in September and October 2023.
  2. Mrs X then complained to us in July 2025. The law says we cannot investigate complaints made to us more than 12 months after a person became aware of the matter, unless there are good reasons for the delay.
  3. Mrs X says in the interim, she tried to exhaust every avenue and did not know where to escalate the complaint. Our details are available via an internet search, and if they did not receive any response from the Care Provider, the route for complaint escalation was to us. In any event, attempts to escalate to regulatory organisations such as the Care Quality Commission would have led to Mrs X being signposted to us.
  4. Mrs X also explained both her parents required support, and she also worked full time. While I understand significant life events were occurring, Mrs X and her sister could have complained to us at the end of 2023 or sought support in doing so. The requirement for complaints to be made to us within 12 months is because further delay reduces our ability to carry out a meaningful investigation. There is not a good reason in this case for us to disapply this legal requirement.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s late complaint because there is not a good reason for the delay in the matter being escalated to the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings