Coventry City Council (23 017 023)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a care provider administering antipsychotic medication to Ms Y in a residential home. The medication was prescribed by a GP, and we could not say any fault by the care provider caused the injustice Mr X claims.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Care Provider (commissioned by the Council), which he says wrongly gave antipsychotic medication to his aunt, Ms Y, to make her compliant. He says it also falsified records to obtain the prescription.
  2. Mr X says this led to Ms Y being confined to a chair and losing her mobility. He says these matters contributed to Ms Y’s death. He says the matter also caused him distress. He wants answers and explanations.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint where the body complained about is not responsible for the issue being raised. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(1), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms Y resided in a residential home. This means the staff at the placement could not prescribe medication, and a GP was required for any prescriptions. The GP prescribed Ms Y an antipsychotic medication. Mr X is concerned the care home staff misled the GP by exaggerating in its records, and therefore believes the Care Provider is responsible for Ms Y’s subsequent decline.
  2. The care staff used wording in Ms Y’s records which the Care Provider has accepted was not appropriate. However, we could not say this caused injustice to Ms Y. We could not say now how Ms Y presented at the time, so we could not say the Care Provider exaggerated or misled the GP in order to obtain a prescription for Ms Y. The Care Provider is not responsible for prescribing medication, and it is not fault for the Care Provider to have asked for medical assistance when it believed this necessary.
  3. The NHS professional, in this case the GP, is ultimately responsible for prescribing medication. It is open to Mr X to complain to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman about decisions made by NHS staff.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Care Provider’s actions were not responsible for any injustice to Ms Y resulting from medication she was prescribed by a health professional.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings