Four Seasons Health Care (England) Limited (23 003 109)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the care fees paid by her mother Mrs X to the Care Provider being higher than its fee now agreed with the Council for the same placement. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Care Provider to warrant an investigation and investigation would not achieve a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X lives in a private care home and did so for several years as a self‑funder. Her daughter Miss X says Mrs X’s funds recently fell below the savings threshold of £23,250 and the local authority has now taken over the funding of Mrs X’s placement at the same home.
  2. Miss X complains the Care Provider charged Mrs X at a much higher rate for the care placement than the Council is now paying.
  3. Miss X says the fee difference shocked her and unsatisfactory answers from the Care Provider caused her frustration. Miss X says Mrs X has depleted her money, which upsets Miss X. Miss X feels Mrs X has been discriminated against as someone who saved for her future.
  4. Miss X wants:
    • all residents to pay the same fees, whether self-funding or not;
    • the Care Provider to make families aware if there must be variations in the fees;
    • self-funder fees to stop subsidising Council placements.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers and decide whether their actions have caused an injustice, or could have caused injustice, to the person making the complaint. I have used the term fault to describe such actions. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B and 34C)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from Miss X, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s complaint is that Mrs X was charged more for her placement when compared with the fee now being paid for it by the Council. But the fee charged by the Care Provider when Mrs X was a self-funder formed part of the contract between her or her representatives and the Provider. They entered into that contract and agreed the Provider’s rate. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Care Provider in agreeing the care fee for Mrs X’s placement under the signed contract terms to warrant us investigating. We cannot go behind that contract now and say the agreed payment terms were fault by the Care Provider, so investigation would not achieve any different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because:
    • there is not enough evidence of fault by the Care Provider to warrant an investigation; and
    • investigation would not achieve a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings