New Care Lytham (OPCO) Limited (22 012 529)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jan 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about adult social care because the local authority safeguarding team would be better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Ms B says a care worker took inappropriate action by leaving a resident unsupervised knowing they were in possession of unauthorised medication and had a history of suicidal tendencies. Ms B says this resulted in her father, Mr C, taking the medication and going to hospital. Ms B says these actions led to the death of Mr C a few weeks later.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the care provider, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

  1. We cannot provide a remedy to someone who has died.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Ombudsman could not say the Care Provider’s actions caused Mr C’s death, only a coroner could establish the cause of death. The Ombudsman also could not say the Care Provider’s actions led to Mr C taking the medication and going to hospital.
  2. Ms B says the member of staff who witnessed Mr C with the medication should not have left him when they went to get help. However, even had the member of staff stayed with Mr C we could not say with certainty that the outcome would be different. Mr C may still have chosen to take the medication. People with capacity can make their own decisions, even decisions which others may consider to be unwise. The Care Provider could not have legally intervened and prevented Mr C taking the medication if the staff member had stayed with him. The Care Provider says it is also possible Mr C had already taken some of the medication before he was seen with it.
  3. Ms B is seeking actions to protect other residents. Local authorities have statutory responsibilities for safeguarding to prevent abuse and neglect. Ms B does not know whether a referral was made to the local authority safeguarding team.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because there is another body better placed to do so. The local authority safeguarding team may investigate whether the Care Provider was neglectful and if it substantiates the allegations can produce an action plan to protect other residents.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings