Jasmine Healthcare Limited (22 001 763)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Summary: We will not investigate Ms B’s complaints about care provided to her parents, Mr and Mrs D. This is because further investigation could not add to the Care Providers responses or make a different finding of the kind Ms B wants.

The complaint

  1. Ms B complained to her parents, Mr and Mrs D’s Care Provider, about the care they received and missing items. Ms B complained her parents had sustained falls resulting in hospital admissions, staff did not use masks when providing care, missing money and jewellery. Ms B wants to know why Mr D’s chain was ripped off his neck. Ms B says she and her parents have suffered distress because of the lack of compassion from the Care Provider and wants it to acknowledge this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers and decide whether their actions have caused an injustice, or could have caused injustice, to the person making the complaint. I have used the term fault to describe such actions. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B and 34C)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Care Provider.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Care Provider apologised staff provided care without wearing a mask and explained the staff member was delivering CPR to a resident and inadvertently forgot to put his mask back on. It apologised for staff mannerisms and the way they made Ms B feel. The Care Provider responded to Ms B’s individual complaints and further investigation by the Ombudsman could not add to this. We could not make a different finding even if we investigated and could not say what happened to the missing money, Mrs D’s ring, or say how Mr D’s chain became broken. The Care Provider confirmed it liaised with the police to assist with its investigation into the missing items. The Care Provider confirmed falls were considered by the Council under its responsibility for safeguarding vulnerable adults but closed the case as no evidence of neglect was found. We could not make a different finding.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because further investigation could not add to the Care Provider’s responses or make a different finding of the kind Ms B wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings