B & M Care/Colleycare Ltd (20 000 414)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Nov 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about possessions belonging to her father which went missing. This is because we could never say what happened to the items and so we cannot provide a worthwhile outcome for Mrs X.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, complains some of her father’s possessions went missing after he passed away in the care home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the care provider, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered Mrs X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information she provided. I also gave Mrs X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on her complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X’s father (Mr Y) was a resident of the care home. Mr Y passed away earlier this year. Mrs X’s husband collected Mr Y’s possessions from the care home. Mrs X complained to the care home because she said several photographs which were very important to Mr Y had not been properly wrapped. Other photographs were missing, as were items including a clock, watch, and an inscribed book.
  2. In its response to Mrs X’s complaint the care provider said Mr Y’s room had been secured after he passed away. His items had then been transferred to another room where they were locked away until collected. The building supervisor said they remembered packing away photographs and the clock. The care provider said there were black bags containing Mr Y’s personal possessions. Mrs X denies the care provider handed over any black bags when her husband collected Mr Y’s belongings. The care provider apologised, but said it could not say where the belongings had gone. It said that “the home fully believe that all your fathers’ belonging were returned to your husband.”
  3. I understand how upset Mrs X must be about her father’s missing possessions. But if the Ombudsman were to investigate, I do not think we would ever be able to establish exactly what happened to them. Mrs X could take legal advice about making a claim against the care provider’s insurers for the value of items such as the clock and watch. However, because the Ombudsman could never say what happened to Mr Y’s possessions, an investigation is not appropriate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because we could not achieve a worthwhile outcome for Mrs X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings