Birmingham City Council (25 028 283)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about inappropriate conduct of staff towards him at his supported living placement. This is because a further investigation would not lead to a different outcome and it is unlikely we could add to the Council’s investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the inappropriate conduct of staff towards him at his supported living placement. The matter caused him distress. He wants the Council to recognise the injustice caused to him and provide him with an apology.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X said whilst he was waiting to speak to the manager of the supported living service, a staff member reached out to him and grabbed his cigarette which he said was inappropriate. A verbal altercation took place between Mr X and staff members at the service.
  2. The Council investigated Mr X’s complaint. In doing so, it spoke with Mr X, the Care Provider of the supported living service and reviewed its daily records. The Council’s investigation found Mr X’s account of what happened differed to the account of staff members and the service’s daily records. As a result, the Council could not come to a finding. However, the Council made recommendations to the Care Provider which included for it to:
    • agree with Mr X to arrange a reasonable process for him to contact the manager;
    • review Mr X’s care and support plan so staff are more aware of how to respond to Mr X and support him to avoid altercations; and
    • review, discuss and amend the existing smoking policy with residents at the service.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X's complaint because the Council has already carried out an appropriate investigation into the matters raised. It considered the available evidence but could not make a finding of fault. A further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. The Council also made appropriate recommendations in response to its findings. It is unlikely we could add to its investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because a further investigation would not lead to a different outcome and it is unlikely we could add to the Council’s investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings