What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Shropshire Council (25 018 825)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisation to place Ms X at a care home. This is because Mrs X has already asked the Court of Protection to consider this decision. The law will not allow us to consider a complaint where court action has started.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that Shropshire Council (the Council) has unjustifiably deprived her of her liberty and prevented her from returning to her own home. She says the decisions have caused her distress and is causing her property to deteriorate.
  2. Ms X wants the Council to allow her to return to her property without social workers becoming involved in her affairs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X moved to a care home in 2025 following a hospital admission under the Mental Health Act (MHA). She understood this would be for two weeks, however the Council has prevented her from leaving using DoLS.
  2. The Council considered it is unsafe for Ms X to return to her home in its current state and without proper support.
  3. The Court of Protection (CoP) deals with decision-making for adults who may lack capacity to make specific decisions for themselves. The CoP may become involved in difficult cases or cases where disagreements cannot be resolved in any other way.
  4. The Council advised Ms X she could challenge the DoLS decision through the CoP and explained how she could be supported to do this.
  5. Ms X has confirmed she has asked the CoP to consider the DoLS decision. This is a reasonable route to consider the DoLS decisions and because the courts have started to consider these concerns, we cannot investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is a matter for which court action has started and continues.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings