Southampton City Council (25 014 934)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to implement its unreasonable and vexatious complainants policy. Mr X’s complaint has been made late and there is no good reason to consider it now. The issues raised also relate to court proceedings, which are outside the Ombudsman’s remit.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council wrongly applied its policy on Unreasonably Persistent and Vexatious Customer Behaviour. It appointed a Single Point of Contact for his future communications. Mr X says this limits his right to complain and restricts free speech.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X has complained about the Council’s decision to apply its Unreasonably Persistent and Vexatious Customer Behaviour policy and restrict how he can contact it. However, I consider Mr X’s complaint about this matter late. A complaint is late if it has taken someone more than 12 months to complain to the Ombudsman. The Council told Mr X its decision to implement the policy in April 2024. I see no good reason to exercise discretion to investigate the matter now as I consider Mr X could have complained to the Ombudsman sooner.
  2. Mr X has also started legal proceedings against the Council as he says it has imposed a gagging order. Mr X would like the Ombudsman to represent him in court.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot represent individuals in court and the law also prevents us from investigating the start of court action. Anything that forms part of court proceedings, including reports prepared by the Council, is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate because the complaint has been made late and there is no good reason to consider it now. The issues raised also relate to court proceedings which are outside the Ombudsman remit.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings