London Borough of Redbridge (24 017 544)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council had not transferred his appointeeship. There is nothing to suggest Mr X has been cause a significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council would not transfer the appointeeship for his finances to a neighbouring borough. He said the Council had not given him his money and that he was reliant on family members for financial support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X used to live in the Council’s area. He moved to a neighbouring borough several years ago. Mr X said the Council refused to transfer responsibility for his appointeeship to the area he now lives.
  2. Although Mr X is unhappy the Council has not transferred the appointeeship, we will not investigate this complaint. Mr X has confirmed to the Ombudsman that he does receive his benefits from the Council and that these are issued through post office vouchers to his mother. As Mr X is receiving the money he is entitled to, there is nothing to suggest he has been caused an injustice by the Council retaining responsibility for his appointeeship.
  3. In addition, we cannot direct the Council to transfer the appointeeship. Following Mr X’s complaint, the Council contacted him to arrange a face-to-face meeting to discuss his request. Mr X has not met with the Council therefore, it has not progressed the transfer of the appointeeship.
  4. The Council has explained it has a process it needs to follow. If Mr X wants to progress the transfer, he needs to meet with the Council to discuss this. Further investigation by the Ombudsman will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence the Council’s actions have caused a significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings