London Borough of Haringey (23 021 116)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s delay in providing him with information about access to advocacy services. This is because the Council has apologised for the oversight, explained what happened and provided Mr B with the information he requested. We could achieve no more.

The complaint

  1. Mr B says he asked the Council to provide him with an advocate in August because the nominated contact person was not able to offer him the level of support he wanted. Mr B complained he did not receive information about advocacy services until the following March.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council apologised to Mr B for the delay in sending him the information he requested about accessing advocacy services. It explained it had overlooked this complaint because it receives numerous emails from Mr B and is dealing with several complaints running alongside each other at the same time. It acknowledged although Mr B was not happy with the support he received from his nominated point of contact; she had tried to help him. The Council advised Mr B of the advocacy services available to him and their contact details.
  2. The Council explained why there was a delay in him receiving the information he requested about advocacy services and apologised. We could achieve no more even if we investigated.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we could achieve no more even if we investigated.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings