Nottinghamshire County Council (23 020 875)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council completed adult safeguarding enquiries. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about how the Council completed safeguarding enquiries about her, in her role as a Shared Lives Carer, for Ms Y. She said the Investigating Officer did not discuss the allegations with her and she disagrees with the outcome of its enquiries.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A council must make enquiries if it thinks a person may be at risk of abuse or neglect and has care and support needs which mean the person cannot protect themselves. An enquiry is the action taken by a council in response to a concern about abuse or neglect.
  2. The Council received a safeguarding referral about how Mrs X was caring for Ms Y. The Council held a strategy meeting to discuss the concerns. It decided it needed to make safeguarding enquiries. The Shared Lives Service spoke to Mrs X during those enquiries.
  3. The Council decided, based on the balance of probabilities, that the concerns were substantiated. It wrote to Mrs X confirming this. Alongside this, the Council took steps to deregister Mrs X as a Shared Lives Carer.
  4. Mrs X is unhappy the Investigating Officer did not discuss the safeguarding concerns with her. It is for the Council to determine what information it needs as part of its enquiries. I have reviewed the steps the Council took following the safeguarding referral, including how it gathered and assessed information. There is no evidence of fault in the Council’s actions therefore we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because these it not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings