East Sussex County Council (19 004 330)

Category : Adult care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council’s social care team has failed to respond appropriately to reports from the complainant about his neighbour. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, says the person who owns the flat above has caused damage by flooding the complainant’s home. Mr X also says the neighbour has harassed him and displayed inappropriate behaviour. Mr X says the neighbour is mentally unwell.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the complaint and the Council’s responses. I considered letters Mr X has written to the Council and letters the neighbour sent to Mr X. I spoke to an officer from the social care team. I invited Mr X to comment on a draft of this decision.
  2. Data protection law prevents me from sharing any information about the neighbour with Mr X.

Back to top

What I found

What happened

  1. Mr X’s neighbour lives in the flat above Mr X’s home. The neighbour owns the flat. Mr X says the neighbour has flooded Mr X’s home several times and has caused a lot of damage. Mr X alleges the neighbour has harassed him and Mr X has involved the police. Mr X alleges the neighbour is mentally unwell and displays unreasonable behaviour. Mr X says the neighbour has made his life ‘hell’ for the last three years. Mr X says the Council has done nothing to help and has hidden behind data protection. In one letter Mr X said the Council should move the neighbour to different accommodation.
  2. I spoke to an officer from the social care team. She explained the Council’s position regarding the neighbour. The officer said the Council had suggested Mr X get legal advice.

Assessment

  1. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. I have spoken to the Council and established the Council’s position with regards to the neighbour. The law prevents me from sharing any information with Mr X but I am satisfied there is no suggestion of fault by the Council.
  2. This appears to be a neighbour dispute and one for which Mr X could seek legal advice or try mediation. The Ombudsman does not intervene in neighbour disputes between two owner occupiers.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings